UPDATED: 11-04-25 19:23 PDT

cfp UTEP 1
  
UTEP                  
W-L: ( 2- 6) PR = 60.8144

Schedule/Results All Games

Date Opponent Conf/State (W-L, PR) Score 830 A Utah St MIDW ( 4- 4, 67.4) 16-28 906 H UT Martin 42-17 913 A Texas SEC ( 7- 2, 83.5) 10-27 920 H La-Monroe SUN ( 3- 6, 58.0) 25-31 927 H La Tech CUSA ( 5- 3, 72.3) 11-30 1008 H Liberty CUSA ( 4- 4, 62.6) 8-19 1015 A SHouston St CUSA ( 0- 8, 51.6) 35-17 1028 A Kennesaw St CUSA ( 6- 2, 72.3) 20-33 1108 H Jacksonv. St CUSA ( 6- 3, 65.0) 1115 A Missouri St 1122 H NM St CUSA ( 3- 5, 60.3) 1129 A Delaware

PREDICTION LIST

               -------------------------------------
               |Real   = actual goal margin        |
               |Pred   = predicted goal margin     |
               |+      = slightly above prediction |
               |++     = above prediction          |
               |+++    = well above prediction     |
               |-      = slightly below prediction |
               |--     = below prediction          |
               |---    = well below prediction     |
               |Goals* = Goals over (+) under (-)  |
               |         prediction. N/A when ten  |
               |         goal limit is exceeded    |
               |n/a    = Outside division          |
               -------------------------------------


   Date  Opponent               Score     Real Pred    +/-   Goals*
   830 A Utah St                16-28     -12   -11          -1.48
   913 A Texas                  10-27     -17   -27    +      3.00
   920 H La-Monroe              25-31      -6     7    ---  -12.72
   927 H La Tech                11-30     -19    -8    ---  -11.41
  1008 H Liberty                 8-19     -11     2    ---  -13.16
  1015 A SHouston St            35-17      18     5    +++   12.76
  1028 A Kennesaw St            20-33     -13   -15    +      2.40

UNDER-ACHIEVED GAMES

   Date  Opponent               Score     Real Pred    +/-   Goals*
   920 H La-Monroe              25-31      -6     7    ---  -12.72
   927 H La Tech                11-30     -19    -8    ---  -11.41
  1008 H Liberty                 8-19     -11     2    ---  -13.16

OVER-ACHIEVED GAMES

   Date  Opponent               Score     Real Pred    +/-   Goals*
  1015 A SHouston St            35-17      18     5    +++   12.76
   913 A Texas                  10-27     -17   -27    +      3.00
  1028 A Kennesaw St            20-33     -13   -15    +      2.40

UTEP Evaluation

The team that earns the point in the pair-wise comparison is based on three criteria: 
first is head-to-head, the winner gets the point, however, if they did not play each
other, than it considers w-l versus common opponents. If their records are tied or they
have no common opponents, than the tie-breaker becomes the better power rating.
The Common Opponent Point list in the table below has the record of the winner followed by the
record of the loser for all common opponents
Opponent Who Gets
the Point?
Head-2-Head
Point
Common Opponent
Point
Power Rating
Point
Boston Col ` Boston Col `   Boston Col `
California California   California
Clemson Clemson   Clemson
Duke Duke   Duke
Florida St Florida St   Florida St
Georgia Tech Georgia Tech   Georgia Tech
Louisville Louisville   Louisville
Miami Miami   Miami
UNC UNC   UNC
NC St NC St   NC St
Pittsburgh Pittsburgh   Pittsburgh
SMU SMU   SMU
Stanford Stanford   Stanford
Syracuse Syracuse   Syracuse
Virginia Virginia   Virginia
Va Tech Va Tech   Va Tech
Wake Forest Wake Forest insuffient: ( 0- 1)( 1- 0) Wake Forest
Army Army   Army
Charlotte UTEP   UTEP
Ea Carolina Ea Carolina   Ea Carolina
Fla Atlantic Fla Atlantic   Fla Atlantic
Memphis Memphis   Memphis
Navy Navy   Navy
No Texas No Texas   No Texas
Rice Rice   Rice
So Florida So Florida   So Florida
Temple Temple   Temple
Tulane Tulane   Tulane
Tulsa Tulsa   Tulsa
UAB UAB   UAB
UTSA UTSA   UTSA
Arizona Arizona   Arizona
Arizona St Arizona St   Arizona St
BYU BYU   BYU
Baylor Baylor   Baylor
Cincinnati Cincinnati   Cincinnati
Colorado Colorado   Colorado
Houston Houston   Houston
Iowa St Iowa St   Iowa St
Kansas Kansas   Kansas
Kansas St Kansas St   Kansas St
Oklahoma St Oklahoma St   Oklahoma St
TCU TCU   TCU
Texas Tech Texas Tech   Texas Tech
UCF UCF   UCF
Utah Utah   Utah
We Virginia We Virginia   We Virginia
Illinois Illinois   Illinois
Indiana Indiana insuffient: ( 0- 1)( 1- 0) Indiana
Iowa Iowa   Iowa
Maryland Maryland   Maryland
Michigan Michigan   Michigan
Michigan St Michigan St   Michigan St
Minnesota Minnesota   Minnesota
Nebraska Nebraska   Nebraska
Northwestern Northwestern insuffient: ( 0- 1)( 1- 0) Northwestern
Ohio St Ohio St insuffient: ( 0- 1)( 1- 0) Ohio St
Oregon Oregon   Oregon
Penn St Penn St   Penn St
Purdue Purdue   Purdue
Rutgers Rutgers   Rutgers
UCLA UCLA   UCLA
USC USC   USC
Washington Washington   Washington
Wisconsin Wisconsin   Wisconsin
Florida Intl Florida Intl tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) Florida Intl
Jacksonv. St Jacksonv. St insuffient: ( 1- 1)( 2- 0) Jacksonv. St
Kennesaw St Kennesaw St Kennesaw St  
Liberty Liberty Liberty  
La Tech La Tech La Tech  
Middle Tenn Middle Tenn tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) Middle Tenn
NM St UTEP tied - ( 1- 2) ( 1- 2) UTEP
SHouston St UTEP UTEP  
We Kentucky We Kentucky insuffient: ( 1- 1)( 2- 0) We Kentucky
UMass UTEP   UTEP
Notre Dame Notre Dame   Notre Dame
UConn UConn   UConn
Akron UTEP   UTEP
Ball St Ball St   Ball St
Bowl. Green UTEP insuffient: ( 0- 1)( 1- 0) UTEP
Buffalo Buffalo   Buffalo
Cen Michigan Cen Michigan   Cen Michigan
Ea Michigan UTEP   UTEP
Kent State UTEP   UTEP
MiamiOH MiamiOH   MiamiOH
No Illinois No Illinois   No Illinois
Ohio Ohio   Ohio
Toledo Toledo   Toledo
We Michigan We Michigan   We Michigan
Air Force Air Force tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) Air Force
Boise State Boise State   Boise State
Colorado St Colorado St   Colorado St
Fresno St Fresno St   Fresno St
Hawaii Hawaii insuffient: ( 1- 1)( 2- 0) Hawaii
Nevada Nevada   Nevada
New Mexico New Mexico insuffient: ( 0- 1)( 1- 0) New Mexico
San Diego St San Diego St   San Diego St
San Jose St San Jose St tied - ( 0- 2) ( 0- 2) San Jose St
UNLV UNLV tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) UNLV
Utah St Utah St Utah St  
Wyoming Wyoming   Wyoming
Oregon St UTEP   UTEP
Wash St Wash St   Wash St
Alabama Alabama insuffient: ( 0- 1)( 1- 0) Alabama
Arkansas Arkansas   Arkansas
Auburn Auburn   Auburn
Florida Florida insuffient: ( 0- 1)( 1- 0) Florida
Georgia Georgia   Georgia
Kentucky Kentucky tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) Kentucky
LSU LSU insuffient: ( 0- 1)( 1- 0) LSU
Missouri Missouri   Missouri
Miss St Miss St tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) Miss St
Oklahoma Oklahoma tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) Oklahoma
Ole Miss Ole Miss   Ole Miss
So Carolina So Carolina   So Carolina
Tennessee Tennessee   Tennessee
Texas Texas Texas  
Texas A&M Texas A&M insuffient: ( 0- 1)( 1- 0) Texas A&M
Vanderbilt Vanderbilt insuffient: ( 0- 2)( 1- 1) Vanderbilt
App St App St   App St
Arkansas State Arkansas State tied - ( 0- 2) ( 0- 2) Arkansas State
Coastal Car Coastal Car insuffient: ( 0- 1)( 1- 0) Coastal Car
Georgia So Georgia So   Georgia So
Georgia St UTEP   UTEP
J Madison J Madison insuffient: ( 0- 1)( 1- 0) J Madison
Louisiana Louisiana   Louisiana
Marshall Marshall   Marshall
Old Dominion Old Dominion Old Dominion   2- 0 vs 0- 2
So Miss So Miss insuffient: ( 0- 2)( 1- 1) So Miss
So Alabama So Alabama   So Alabama
Texas State Texas State   Texas State
Troy Troy insuffient: ( 0- 1)( 1- 0) Troy
La-Monroe La-Monroe La-Monroe  

PowerWise = 10


division Games Only
Average number of games used in Games Correction = 8.46

 Date  Opponent          (W-L  PR)      SCORE       SAFE        SAFE       Home       No Games           SCI              
                                                    Loss        Win       Field      Correction         Points            
                                                    SLP         SWP     Advantage      Factor                       
                                                      
   0 A Utah St         ( 4- 4, 67.4)    16-28      -32.50      21.49       3.93         1.21           -17.27
   0 A Texas           ( 7- 2, 83.5)    10-27      -16.41      37.58       3.93         1.21            -7.55
   0 H La-Monroe       ( 3- 6, 58.0)    25-31      -41.87      12.12      -3.93         1.21           -27.69
   0 H La Tech         ( 5- 3, 72.3)    11-30      -27.56      26.43      -3.93         1.21           -19.04
   0 H Liberty         ( 4- 4, 62.6)     8-19      -37.31      16.68      -3.93         1.21           -24.93
   0 A SHouston St     ( 0- 8, 51.6)    35-17      -48.25       5.74       3.93         1.21            23.38
   0 A Kennesaw St     ( 6- 2, 72.3)    20-33      -27.62      26.37       3.93         1.21           -14.32
                                                                                                        ------
                                                                                                       -87.41

winning pts = 23.3759 losing points = -110.7875

             SCI ={(SLP or SLW) +/- home-field advantage} * Game Correction.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
| (W-L PR) = Won-loss record and power rating |
| SCORE = game score |
| SAFE Loss (SLP) = Points deducted for losing to the opponent |
| SAFE Win (SWP) = Points awarded for defeating the opponent |
| Home-field Advantage = goals deducted/awarded for site |
| No games correction = normalzation based on a ~16 game schedule |
------------------------------------------------------------------------